Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates financial and social performance in Chinese film enterprises, suggesting regulatory frameworks affect economics and society.
This study evaluates the impact of China’s Film Industry Promotion Law —the first industry-specific law in the cultural sector—on the financial and social performance of Chinese film enterprises. Using a Propensity Score Matching-Difference- in-Differences (PSM-DID) approach with data from A-share listed companies (2011–2019), the study finds that while the law improved social performance, it led to a decline in financial performance. However, overall corporate performance significantly improved. These results highlight the dual role of regulatory frameworks in balancing social benefits and economic outcomes. The study fills a research gap, introduces an innovative analytical framework, and enhances understanding of how institutional environments affect corporate performance, offering valuable insights for shaping film industry policies in developing countries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: