Retrospective analysis shows 88.7% rhythm success after Cox-Maze IV in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, indicating it remains effective despite surgical complexity.
Background: This study aims to evaluate the long-term rhythm outcomes of the Cox-Maze IV procedure in patients undergoing complex cardiac surgery, where atrial fibrillation ablation was performed as a second, third, or fourth-and-beyond concomitant operation. Methods: Between October 2018 and February 2025, a total of 71 patients (24 males, 47 females; mean age: 59±10 years; range, 36 to 80 years) who underwent a complete Cox-Maze IV lesion set and achieved at least six months of rhythm follow-up were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were grouped by the number of concomitant cardiac procedures performed: Group 1 (one procedure, n=16), Group 2 (two procedures, n=43), and Group 3 (≥3 procedures, n=12). Rhythm monitoring included 24-h Holter and pacemaker interrogation. Results: At a mean follow-up of 26±2 months, overall freedom rate from atrial tachyarrhythmias was 88.7%. Group-specific freedom rate from atrial tachyarrhythmias at 36 months was as follows: 100% in Group 1, 80.0% in Group 2, and 87.5% in Group 3. No significant intergroup differences were observed. Pacemaker implantation was needed in 7.0% of the patients. Higher procedural complexity did not adversely affect rhythm outcomes. Conclusion: Our study results suggest that Cox-Maze IV provides excellent long-term rhythm control even in complex cardiac surgeries involving multiple concomitant procedures. The effectiveness of the procedure appears to be preserved across increasing surgical complexity, supporting its broader application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adademir et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: