Essay explores human-rights claims for expanding ART access to marginalized populations including LGBTQ+ parents, suggesting the need for reparations.
This essay uses the lens of reproductive justice theory to ask whether the right to procreate should extend to the right to use assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in pursuit of procreation – particularly in the historical and contemporary contexts of the United States. I begin with a brief gloss of different legal bases of a right to procreate in general, including human-rights bases not commonly used in the US. I then review four primarily rights-based arguments for expanding ART access within different regulatory scenarios, contrasting US approaches with those of other contexts. In the third section, drawing on the work of Olúfẹ́mi O. Táíwò, I present my justice-based argument for expanding ART access in the US as a matter of reparations for reproductive injustices faced by marginalized communities. Finally, I consider the question of whether LGBTQ+ would-be parents also have justice (as opposed to rights-based) claims to ART access.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Camisha Russell (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: