Prospective cohort study achieved 97.9% implant survivorship and improved patient-reported outcomes, indicating promising early performance.
Purpose To evaluate the early safety and performance of a novel anatomical‐design bicruciate‐retaining total knee arthroplasty (BCR‐TKA) implant (JOURNEY™ II XR; JIIXR) in a prospective multicenter single‐arm cohort, with 2‐year implant survivorship as the prespecified primary endpoint, and patient‐reported outcomes and radiographic findings as secondary exploratory endpoints. Methods Ninety‐four patients (106 knees) underwent cemented BCR‐TKA with JIIXR at eight centers. The primary endpoint was 2‐year survivorship tested for noninferiority versus a 98% benchmark using exact binomial (one‐sided 97.5% CI) and Kaplan–Meier methods. Secondary endpoints included the EuroQol 5‐Dimension 5‐Level (EQ‐5D‐5L) questionnaire, its visual analogue scale (EQ‐VAS), Forgotten Joint Score‐12 (FJS‐12, collected postoperatively only), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), range of motion, and radiolucent lines assessed in standardized zones. Results At 2 years, survivorship was 97.9% (94/96), confirming non‐inferiority ( p = 0.0064). Patient‐reported outcome measures improved over follow‐up: EQ‐VAS increased from 62.0 preoperatively to 83.7 at 2 years; EQ‐5D‐5L index from 0.61 to 0.84; and KOOS pain and symptoms from 52.8 and 59.2 to 87.9 and 84.6, respectively. FJS‐12 increased from 40.0 at 3 months to 65.4 at 2 years. Across measures, the changes exceeded published minimally clinically important differences (MCIDs): all KOOS subscales met MCID by 1 year, EQ‐VAS exceeded MCID by 3 months, and FJS‐12 exceeded MCID between 3 months and 1 year. Radiolucent lines were observed in 35 knees (36.5%); total length decreased from 5.1 ± 6.7 mm at 3 months to 2.6 ± 2.3 mm at 2 years with no radiographic loosening. Range of motion at 2 years was similar to baseline. Conclusions In this prospective single‐arm multicenter study, an anatomical‐design BCR‐TKA implant achieved good 2‐year survivorship and clinically meaningful improvements in patient‐reported outcomes, with stable radiographic findings. These data support early safety and performance while underscoring the need for long‐term comparative studies to establish durability and relative effectiveness. Level of Evidence Level II, therapeutic study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamagami et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: