Experimental analysis showed that silane primers significantly enhance bond strength in zirconia composites, indicating improved adhesion stability.
The poor interfacial adhesion between dental zirconia and resin composites remains a critical limitation affecting the long-term clinical performance of zirconia-based restorations. This study constructed a novel zirconia-glass composite surface through melt-infiltration of SiO2-Li2O-Al2O3 glass, systematically evaluating the influence of different ceramic primers coating on the resin bonding strength. Three surface coating treatments were applied to acid-etched composite surfaces: Monobond N (silane+10-MDP), Clearfil Ceramic Primer Plus (silane+10-MDP), or Z-Prime Plus (10-MDP-only), with control groups consisting of airborne-particle abrasion treated zirconia with identical primers and an untreated group. The experiment results demonstrated that all glass-infiltrated and primed groups (GHM, GHC, GHZ) exhibited significantly enhanced immediate shear bond strengths (>30 MPa) compared to the airborne-particle abrasion groups. After 5000 thermal cycles, groups treated with the combined silane and 10-MDP primers (GHM, GHC) demonstrated remarkable bond stability, outperforming the group receiving the 10-MDP-only primer (GHZ). This superior performance was attributed to the enhanced wetting properties of the composite surface, as all primer formulations achieved consistently low contact angles (∼20°) on the acid-etched substrate, effectively mitigating their intrinsic wettability differences. Advanced spectroscopic analyses employing XPS and FTIR techniques elucidated a synergistic bonding mechanism in Group GHM and Group GHC, featuring simultaneous formation of Si-O-Si covalent bonds with the glass infiltrate layer and P-O-Zr coordination bonds with the zirconia substrate. This study demonstrates that applying a composite primer containing both silane and 10-MDP to the zirconia-glass interface improves bonding performance and stability under laboratory conditions. These findings merit further study to assess their clinical applicability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: