Demonstration of a routing protocol improves routing information fidelity in quantum systems, indicating strong performance.
The implementation of a quantum router capable of performing both quantum signal routing and quantum addressing (a <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:msup> <a:mrow> <a:mrow> <a:mi mathvariant="normal">Q</a:mi> </a:mrow> </a:mrow> <a:mn>2</a:mn> </a:msup> </a:math> -router) represents a key step toward building quantum networks and quantum random access memories. We realize a <d:math xmlns:d="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <d:msup> <d:mrow> <d:mrow> <d:mi mathvariant="normal">Q</d:mi> </d:mrow> </d:mrow> <d:mn>2</d:mn> </d:msup> </d:math> -router that uses fixed-frequency transmon qubits to implement a routing protocol based on two native controlled- <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <g:mi>i</g:mi> </g:math> gates. These gates leverage a large <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <i:mi>Z</i:mi> <i:mi>Z</i:mi> </i:math> interaction to selectively route information according to a quantum address. We find an estimated average routing fidelity of <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <k:mn>95.3</k:mn> <k:mi mathvariant="normal">%</k:mi> </k:math> , with errors arising primarily from decoherence or state preparation and measurement. We present a comprehensive calibration and characterization of both the c- <n:math xmlns:n="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <n:mi>i</n:mi> </n:math> gates and the overall routing protocol through randomized benchmarking techniques and state tomography.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: