This perspective reveals the urgency for effective leadership in institutions, suggesting that empirical research can enhance community participation in STEM.
There is no better time than this to draw attention to the research and practice of leaders who work toward achieving broadening participation success within their institutions and across the entire undergraduate STEM reform community. This Editor’s Perspective calls into view the extraordinary work of several authors, the perplexing times in which they write, and our collective resistance to calls for us to be silent. Through empirical research and leadership narrative, this issue affirms the importance and urgency of effective leadership in STEM higher education, and the necessity for this journal’s existence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kelly Mack (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: