Cross-sectional study shows high economic burden and healthcare costs among CKD patients on dialysis in urban Agra, suggesting financial strains due to out-of-pocket expenses.
Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a significant public health concern worldwide. Maintenance haemodialysis (MHD) is a critical treatment for end-stage renal disease patients. Despite the existence of government subsidies, patients undergoing MHD face considerable economic burdens, particularly in low- and middle-income regions such as Agra. Aim and Objectives: The aims and objectives of this study were to determine the sociodemographic profile and economic burden of CKD patients on MHD in health facilities of Agra city. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at two government and one charitable healthcare facility in Agra city. Data were collected from 250 patients aged 18 years and above using a pre-tested questionnaire. Informed consent and institutional approvals were obtained. Statistical analysis was done using Microsoft Excel 2021 and free Jamovi software version 2.6.25. Results: Amongst the study participants, more were aged 18–45 years (48.4%), male (62.4%) and from urban areas (60.8%). The economic burden was substantial, with 99.6% of patients incurring out-of-pocket expenses and 76.4% facing catastrophic health expenditure (CHE). Distress financing affected 65.2% patients. CHE was most prevalent in the lower-middle class (28.4%) and least in the upper class (1.2%), with a significant increase in CHE from upper to lower middle class ( P = 0.000). Conclusions: The study highlights that the most affected group was male aged 18–45 years, from urban areas. The majority incurring out-of-pocket expenses with a high prevalence of CHE. Distress financing was common, particularly amongst the lower middle socioeconomic class, indicating a significant positive association between economic status and financial hardship due to healthcare costs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
shukla et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: