Development and testing of a decision aid improves usability and supports shared decision-making for myopia management in children.
Background Childhood myopia, intensified by rapid technological advancements, is an escalating public health issue. Shared decision-making (SDM) facilitates collaborative treatment engagement and adherence, contributing to the mitigation of myopia progression. Objective This study developed and evaluated a web-based decision aid aimed at assisting parents in making informed, value-aligned decisions. Methods Following the International Patient Decision Aid Standards framework, we conducted a two-phase process: development (scoping, stakeholder engagement, and content planning) and testing (prototype creation and alpha and beta testing with external users) to develop the Childhood Myopia Shared Decision-Making Aid (CMSDM) to support informed and value-congruent treatment decisions. The study involved 55 parents, 12 ophthalmologists, 3 school nurses, 2 health education teachers, and 20 optometrists. Results CMSDM comprises two decision aids (myopia treatment and optical correction) with six components: (1) Introduction—stating the purpose of the tool; (2) Comparison—outlining treatment options with pros and cons; (3) Consideration—prompting value reflection; (4) Understanding—clarifying key points; (5) Decision—guiding informed choice; and (6) Submission—sharing the decision with the ophthalmologist. A review from five experts provided the aid with a content validity index of 0.85, demonstrating consensus on content relevance. Users reported a mean System Usability Scale score of 85, indicating excellent usability. The use of CMSDM was associated with improved parental knowledge (t = 2.31, p < 0.01; Cohen's d = 0.60) and reduced decisional regret (t = 2.01, p < 0.05; Cohen's d = 0.52) in preliminary testing. Conclusions CMSDM, the first SDM aid for childhood myopia, supports informed parental choice. Its effectiveness should be further examined in randomized controlled trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hung et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: