Auto-ethnography illustrates how gender transition and time complicate narratives for trans people, suggesting challenges of suffering.
This essay advances a trans Buddhist model of gender transition that I term “gender becoming.” Challenging progress narratives of gender transition dominant within the United States, I argue that gender transition is not teleological but a process of becoming : a constantly opening and unwieldly process that cannot be dictated in advance, but shifts based on bodily feelings, memories, and new experiences. Through a critical auto-ethnography analyzing my own bodily experiences alongside Buddhist philosophy, trans theory, and affect thought, I illustrate how gender transition is not always happy but can be unexpectedly painful, anger-some, and confusing. Drawing specifically on a Buddhist philosophy known as the 12 Links in the Law of Dependent Origination, I examine how trans people can become trapped in our desire and need for a happy and non-dysphoric bodily and emotional experience. Underlining how such narratives for happiness can cause trans people to suffer, I instead introduce a way of working through gender transition that is grounded in a re-orientation to time and feeling. Affectively and teleologically expansive, “gender becoming” posits time as always already changing, and our bodies residing in these forever times of transition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ray Buckner (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: