Experiment demonstrates reduced nasal hyperreactivity and inflammation in a mouse model of allergic rhinitis, suggesting dual targeting of cytokines may enhance therapy.
Th2 cytokines (IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13) play an important role in the development of allergies, including allergic rhinitis (AR). IL-13 promotes mucus hypersecretion in the airways and IL-5 recruits eosinophils to the nasal mucosa, leading to increased inflammation and tissue damage. Drugs based on monoclonal antibodies that block the activity of these cytokines are being developed for the treatment of allergic diseases. However, studies of drugs that target IL-13 alone (such as Trabokinumab and Lebrikizumab) were not successful. Given that IL-5 and IL-13 have different roles in AR, simultaneous inhibition of both cytokines may be a promising approach. New methods of regulating gene activity, such as RNA interference (RNAi), offer new perspectives for the development of drugs. This study describes a complex consisting of siRNAs that inhibit the activity of or genes and a carrier peptide LTP. The effects of this complex on the allergic inflammation in a mouse model of AR was studied. Suppression of expression decreased nasal hyperreactivity and reduced the number of goblet cells in the respiratory epithelium of AR-induced mice. Inhibiting the gene had a more beneficial effect than suppression alone, further contributing to reducing the number of cells infiltration the nasal cavity. When both and were suppressed simultaneously, the result was similar to that of inhibition alone. Likely, IL-13 plays a more significant role in the development of AR than IL-5. As a result, the possibility of using RNAi for anti-cytokine therapy for AR has been demonstrated. However, dual inactivation of IL-5 and IL-13 by siRNAs does not provide any advantages over inactivating IL-13 alone in the current mouse model of AR. However, the lack of success of anti-IL-13 therapy in clinical practice indicates the promise of an approach based on the dual blocking of IL-5 and IL-13.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
M.M. Kaganova (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: