Discussion highlights innovations in psychological science and challenges research continuity in historical psychology.
The text was prepared in the order of the discussion on the pages of the Psychological Journal of the article by Yu.N. Oleinik and A.L. Zhuravlev “Scientific traditions as a mechanism of continuity of psychological cognition”, published in two parts: Part 1. - “The state and difficulties of studying” and Part 2. - “Problems and prospects of research” (Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, № 3-4, 2024). The valuable ideas of the article under discussion, which are important for psychological science and its history, are noted; in addition, controversial provisions are highlighted, and options for their correction and addition are proposed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O. Noskova (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: