Analysis reveals intersubjectivity and nonviolence in Buddhist traditions, highlighting new insights in social ontology.
Using Wang Enyang’s Yogācāra as a window, I analyze a modern recasting of Buddhist intersubjectivity as the foundation of an irrealist social ontology. Specifically, I investigate Wang’s use of adhipati (activating and amplifying influence; Chinese zengshang li , 增上力), a central Yogācāra doctrine that lays out the karmic mechanism of how different mental continuums could directly influence one another without presuming an “objective” outside. As I show, Wang superscribed onto adhipati a surprising social function—transformative nonviolence—when he struggles to make sense of intersubjective responsibility in events of murder and massacre. Joining the emerging studies of intersubjectivity in Buddhist traditions, I show that studying modern Yogācāra opens a new path to reconsider the premises of some Anglo-European debates, such as the realist versus idealist social ontologies, the ontological primacy of the individual versus the social, and the relationship between justice and nonviolence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jessica Zu (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: