Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review shows splenic vein involvement correlates with worse survival, suggesting need for neoadjuvant therapy.
Background: The prognostic impact of radiographic splenic vessel involvement in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) of the body and tail remains controversial. Methods: A systematic search was performed using PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus in accordance with the PRISMA and AMASTAR guidelines. The primary outcome was 5-year overall survival (OS). Time-to-event method was used. Results: Eight articles involving 1678 patients were analyzed. Patients with radiological splenic artery (SA) invasion had poorer OS than those without (hazard ratio (HR) 1.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14–2.29; P = 0.007). Similarly, radiological splenic vein (SV) involvement was associated with significantly worse OS (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.13–2.44; P = 0.010). Subgroup analyses for SA involvement, categorized by “abutment” and “encasement,” showed an overall HR of 2.35 (95% CI 1.72–3.19; P < 0.00001), with HRs of 1.77 (95% CI 1.25–2.59; P = 0.001) for abutment and 3.03 (95% CI 2.20–4.17; P < 0.00001) for encasement, indicating a significant difference between subgroups (P = 0.02). For SV involvement, the overall HR was 2.15 (95% CI 1.49–3.10; P < 0.001), with HRs of 1.66 (95% CI 0.97–2.84; P = 0.07) for abutment and 2.80 (95% CI 1.98–3.96; P < 0.0001) for encasement, showing no significant difference between subgroups (P = 0.11). Conclusion: This meta-analysis showed worse survival in patients with splenic vessel infiltration of PDAC. Therefore, SA and SV invasion may serve as indications for neoadjuvant therapy for resectable PDAC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: