Observational analysis identifies higher subjective social status linked to increased exclusive breastfeeding rates, suggesting potential intervention strategies.
Introduction: Subjective social status (SSS), which describes one's perceived hierarchical rank, may provide a more accurate prediction of health than traditional socioeconomic measures. The specific relationship between SSS and breastfeeding outcomes is understudied. Our objectives were to: (1) investigate factors associated with SSS, (2) assess the relationship between prenatal SSS and any or exclusive breastfeeding at 3 and 6 months, and (3) evaluate the relationship between prenatal SSS and breastfeeding duration. Methods: Overall, 2,870 participants from the Canadian Healthy Infant Longitudinal Development birth cohort data were included. Prenatal SSS was self-ranked at 18 weeks' gestation using the MacArthur Scale and categorized as low (1-5), moderate (6-7), and high (8-10) SSS. Any and exclusive breastfeeding were categorized at 3 and 6 months postpartum, along with breastfeeding duration. Multivariable logistics and linear regression were conducted. Results: After adjusting for race, education, income, marital status, employment, and parity, the odds of exclusive breastfeeding at 3 months were 1.51 times higher [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.18, 1.94] in the high SSS group than in the low SSS group. The likelihood of any breastfeeding at 6 months was 1.45 times higher [95% CI: 1.10, 1.92] in the moderate SSS group than the low SSS group. Women with high SSS breastfed for approximately 42 days longer than women with low SSS. Conclusion: SSS was associated with exclusive breastfeeding at 3 months, any breastfeeding at 6 months, and breastfeeding duration. SSS may offer a more patient-centered indicator of health, informing targeted interventions for individuals at risk of suboptimal breastfeeding outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kolli et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: