Analysis shows increased nitrate leaching risk from flood managed aquifer recharge in drier climates, suggesting careful management is needed.
Flood managed aquifer recharge (Flood‐MAR) is an emerging practice to enhance groundwater sustainability through recharge of aquifers. However, in agricultural systems Flood‐MAR may harm groundwater quality, given residual soil nitrate (NO 3 − ). This research evaluated Flood‐MAR NO 3 − leaching risk across a precipitation and soil textural gradient in a globally important agricultural region, California's Central Valley, and whether Flood‐MAR timing strategies could mitigate the risk. Using multi‐decadal root zone water quality model simulations of irrigated and fertilized maize (250 kg N ha −1 year −1 ) on well‐drained soils as a representative case‐study, results suggest Flood‐MAR can be used with near‐negligible additional NO 3 − leaching in locations with median annual precipitation >400 mm year −1 . In those locations, wet‐year precipitation leached most residual NO 3 − without practicing Flood‐MAR. At drier locations, Flood‐MAR NO 3 − leaching risk increased most clearly in loamy soils. Additional NO 3 − leaching risk increased in drier climates because minimal precipitation‐driven deep percolation maintained residual NO 3 − accumulation across growing seasons. In fine‐texture soils, NO 3 − leaching risk was mitigated by denitrification, preventing residual NO 3 − accumulation. Flood‐MAR practices diminished denitrification, leaching NO 3 − rapidly when soils were colder and biogeochemically inactive, and thereby decreased growing season denitrification when soils were warmer and denitrification rates higher. Effects of Flood‐MAR timing strategies (January Flood‐MAR vs. March Flood‐MAR), combined with variable pauses among applications (3‐ vs. 7‐ vs. 21‐day intervals) were negligible. Infrequent Flood‐MAR should be practiced with care in arid climates and especially after prolonged droughts coinciding with more limited irrigation water supplies that constrain salt‐leaching practices all favoring residual NO 3 − accumulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Devine et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: