Analysis uncovers implications of biosemiotic theory on translation and ontology, suggesting a framework for understanding ecotranslatology.
This paper explores the implications that a biosemiotic theory of translation holds for the debate on ecotranslatology. It considers several current onto-epistemological positions, arguing that some of them are either light on or problematic in their ontology. The paper then considers Kalevi Kull’s four-tier ontology and expands it into a five-tier ontology within which to think about translation and ecology. Relating Kull’s expanded ontology to John Deely’s semiotic realist views, it sets forth a complex onto-epistemology. The paper closes by arguing that translation provides the link between ontology and epistemology as well as between mutually exclusive onto-epistemologies, hence the proposal of a translational ecology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kobus Marais (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: