Analysis reveals significant effects of voxel volume on mean diffusivity in cardiac diffusion tensor imaging, indicating optimal configurations for SNR maximization.
Purpose Cardiac diffusion tensor imaging (cDTI) is signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR)‐limited due to diffusion signal attenuation, long echo times from gradient moment nulling, and moderate myocardial T. Increasing voxel volume improves SNR but reduces spatial sensitivity and introduces physiological bias . This work aimed to identify the voxel configuration (volume and shape) yielding the most precise cDTI metrics. Methods Spin‐echo cDTI protocols spanning nine voxel volumes were evaluated in healthy subjects (N = 11) at 3T. A gel phantom was scanned to compare SNR in a non‐physiologic environment. Temporal SNR and regression fits were computed. Mean diffusivity (MD), fractional anisotropy (FA), bootstrapped uncertainties (, ), Helix angle pitch (HAP), and the primary eigenvector's uncertainty () were then calculated, and significant () differences were assessed. Technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) ranked configurations by uncertainties. Results Phantom SNR trends corresponded to theory, with consistent SNR increases. In vivo SNR increases differed between in‐plane resolutions, in which mm in‐plane resolutions had the steepest slope. Higher in‐plane resolutions ( mm) yielded lower MD than lower resolutions ( mm). Higher in‐plane resolutions with thicker slices produced higher FA ( mm). HAP was steepest at moderate voxel sizes ( mm). All uncertainties decreased with 8 mm slices. TOPSIS ranked mm highest (0.91), then (0.83). Conclusion In vivo differences in SNR slopes suggest a physiological bias‐dominated environment. The mm voxel configuration had the lowest uncertainties (highest TOPSIS score), followed by mm. This work provides a framework for evaluating the best cDTI voxel configuration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hannum et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: