Extraction of anthocyanins shows improved yield in grape skins, indicating deep eutectic solvents as an efficient alternative.
Deep eutectic solvents (DES) were selected for the extraction of anthocyanins from red grape skins as an efficient and environmentally friendly solvent alternative to traditional mixtures based on methanol. In silico studies (COSMO-RS) were employed as screening tools to identify the most suitable options, significantly reducing the chemical space of potential DES to be studied. A total of 30,132 DES combinations were assessed. The DESs selected were polyalcohols (ethyleneglycol, glycerol, 1,2-propanediol, and 1,6-hexanediol) and carboxylic acids (citric, oxalic, malic, and lactic acid) as hydrogen bond donors (HBD) and choline chloride, betaine, or salts (potassium carbonate, sodium acetate, and propionate), as hydrogen bond acceptors (HBA). Choline chloride:glycerol and choline chloride:oxaclic acic were selected as solvents to optimize time, temperature, and water content in ultrasound- and microwave-assisted extraction of anthocyanins. In both cases, around 20 wt% of water was found to be the optimum to maximize the extractions, whereas extraction time and temperature depended on the type of anthocyanin. The amount of malvidin-3-O-glucoside extracted by microwave-assisted extraction with choline chloride: oxalic acid was 172 ± 7 mg/kg and 119.5 ± 0.5 mg/kg by ultrasound-assisted extraction with choline chloride: glycerol, which means an increase in performance of, respectively, 64 and a 13% compared to the traditional method.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salcedo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: