Mixed-method study shows cultural competence varies by interaction frequency with foreign patients, suggesting training can enhance skills.
Background Previous studies have emphasized that interactions with foreign patients were associated with high cultural competence among Japanese healthcare professionals (J-HCPs), with little focus on the individual components of cultural competence. This study examines how frequencies of treating foreign patients are associated with the components of cultural competence among J-HCPs, using a mixed-method design. Methods Quantitative data were collected from 1089 J-HCPs via internet survey assessing cultural competence using the Cross-Cultural Competence Instrument for Healthcare Professionals (J-CCCHP), containing subscales, motivation/curiosity, emotion/empathy, attitude, and skill. Associations were stratified by the participation in trainings for treating foreign patients. Qualitative data were further collected from 16 key-informant interviews recruited by snowball sampling. Results J-HCPs who treated foreign patients several times a week (n = 203, 18.6%) scored a lower attitude score (coefficient = − 0.67, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] − 1.28, − 0.06), and a higher skill score (coefficient = 1.36, 95% CI 0.43, 2.29) compared to those who treated almost none. Those who treated foreign patients several times a year scored higher in motivation/curiosity, additionally. Qualitative studies explained that rewarding experiences and gaining extensive knowledge in treating foreign patients enhanced J-HCPs’ motivation/curiosity and skill. Stress due to extra workload, language barriers and cultural differences, insufficient resources and the lack of institutional support might lower the attitude of J-HCPs. Conclusions Treating foreign patients is associated with high motivation and skill but low attitude scores among J-HCPs, due to systemic challenges. Providing reliable interpretation services, offering practical cultural competence training, and strengthening institutional support may help reduce these challenges.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: