Analysis reveals optimal vehicle and charger numbers for electric vehicle fleets, suggesting improvements in service level and requiring innovative management policies.
We study electric vehicle (EV) fleet and charging infrastructure planning in a spatial setting. For a centrally managed fleet that serves customer requests arriving continuously at a rate [Formula: see text] throughout the day, we determine the minimum number of vehicles and chargers for a target service level along with matching and charging policies. Whereas non-EV systems require extra [Formula: see text] vehicles because of pickup times, EV systems differ. Charging increases nominal capacity, enabling pickup time reductions and allowing for an extra fleet requirement of only [Formula: see text] for [Formula: see text], depending on charging infrastructure and battery pack sizes. We propose the power-of-d dispatching policy, which achieves this performance by selecting the closest vehicle with the highest battery level from d options. We extend our results to accommodate time-varying demand patterns and discuss conditions for transitioning between EV and non-EV capacity planning. Simulations verify our scaling results, insights, and policy effectiveness. Whereas long-range, fast-charging fleets resemble non-EV systems, short-range, low-cost fleets can still perform competitively, underscoring the need for EV-aware management policies. This paper was accepted by Victor Martínez de Albéniz, operations management. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.08524 .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Varma et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: