Field study evaluates rice performance following herbicide treatments, indicating clomazone as viable for ryegrass control.
The recommended method of control for glyphosate-resistant (GR) Italian ryegrass in Mississippi is the utilization of fall-applied residual herbicides; however, these treatments may negatively impact rice performance. A field study was conducted at the Mississippi State University Delta Research and Extension Center to evaluate rice performance following fall-applied treatments of residual herbicides plus flumioxazin at different rates. Pooled over with and without flumioxazin and herbicide rates, clomazone and dimethenamid-P caused < 10% injury 28 d after emergence (DAE). Acetochlor delayed rice maturity 2 d when compared to clomazone, dimethenamid-P, and flumioxazin. Rice density was reduced ≥ 4 plants m -2 following fall-applied acetochlor and dimethenamid-P compared to the nontreated. Rough rice yields were reduced ≥ 670 kg ha -1 with fall-applied acetochlor alone and dimethenamid-P compared to the nontreated. Acetochlor should not be utilized as a fall-applied treatment in areas scheduled for growing rice the following season. Given current label restrictions and rice injury caused by acetochlor and dimethenamid-P, clomazone remains the only viable option for controlling GR Italian ryegrass where rice is scheduled to be planted the following spring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eubank et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: