Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
November 30, 2025Journal of Sports Sciences

Assessing the accuracy of in-stadium and portable multi-camera markerless motion capture for baseball pitching kinematics and kinetics

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

AAArnel L. AguinaldoTCTyler CardinaleDSD Taylor La Salle

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Analysis confirms accuracy of multi-camera systems for kinematics in baseball pitching, indicating potential for ecological validity.

Key Points

  • In-stadium and portable markerless systems estimated baseball pitching kinematics and kinetics accurately.
  • Error metrics revealed root mean square error values for capturing motion dynamics effectively.
  • Statistical parametric mapping and concordance correlation coefficients were key methods for evaluation.
  • Findings support the use of markerless systems, highlighting advantages for practical applications in sports biomechanics.

Cite This Study

Aguinaldo et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/692b943e1d383f2b2a378917https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2595411
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Inter-system differences in modelling approaches for shoulder joint kinematics between markerless and marker-based motion capture during baseball pitching2026
  2. 2Comparison of Marker-Based and Markerless Motion Capture Systems for Measuring Throwing Kinematics2025 · 5 citations
  3. 3Validation of upper extremity kinematics using Markerless motion capture2024 · 31 citations
  4. 4Reliability of Markerless Motion Capture Systems for Assessing Movement Screenings2024 · 16 citations
  5. 5Biological reliability of a movement analysis assessment using a markerless motion capture system2024 · 10 citations