Commentary highlights that stenting may influence the outcomes of repeated procedures in heart studies, suggesting further analysis is needed.
In a commentary by Knudtson (1), the last sentence of the penultimate paragraph should read as follows: “Because stenting was not used in CAPRI and in other trials referred to in the subject meta-analysis, there is reason to believe that the large repeated-procedure differential noted is greater than that reported in the current ‘stent era.’”
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 1997 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: