This analysis demonstrates an optimal power management framework reduces power loss by over 94%, indicating significant improvements in emissions and cost efficiency for distributed generators.
This study proposes an improved version of the wild horse optimizer (WHO) for the optimal allocation and sizing of distributed generators (DGs) and capacitor banks (CBs) to promote the system’s susceptibility. The proposed method, namely, improved WHO (IWHO), aims to improve the performance of the system not only in terms of power loss, voltage deviation index (VDI), and voltage stability index (VSI) as in most previous studies, but also in terms of generation cost and total emissions. Five operational cases are carried out on four different systems, the IEEE 33‐bus, 69‐bus, 118‐bus standard radial distribution systems and the real 78‐bus Egyptian distribution system, to demonstrate the best performance of the proposed technique. In addition, two multiobjective functions are implemented to compare with the original WHO and other existing optimization techniques. Based on the statistical analysis, the simulation results prove that the proposed IWHO provides the best results for flexible operations, especially for large‐scale complex systems. After the optimal integration of DGs and CBs, the power loss was reduced up to 94.18%, 98.53%, 92.05%, and 93.87%; the cost was reduced by 43.23%, 43.77%, 14.68%, and 99.99%; and the emissions were reduced by 99.96%, 99.99%, 76.01%, and 61.20% for 33‐bus, 69‐bus, 118‐bus radial systems and the real 78‐bus system, respectively. It is observed that the IWHO algorithm also gives recognized enhancements in conflicting objective functions such as technical, economic, and environmental objectives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ali et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: