Cross-sectional survey found low use of interventions to reduce air pollution exposure in adults, suggesting socioeconomic factors influence adoption.
Introduction Exposure to air pollution is a major environmental hazards to human health. This study aimed to assess personal interventions to reduce air pollution exposure in a representative sample of Poles aged 18–64 years, as well as to identify factors associated with these personal interventions. Methods This is a secondary analysis of data from the nationwide cross-sectional survey carried out in December 2024 in a representative sample of adults in Poland aged 18–64 years. Questions on four personal interventions to reduce air pollution exposure were analyzed. Results In the analyzed population ( n = 5,006), the percentage of women was 49.9%, average age of 41.8 (SD = 12.59). Among the respondents, 18.2% reported closing windows at home to protect against air pollution, and 16.1% reported using air purifiers at home. Avoiding outdoor walking during high-pollution periods and monitoring air-quality alerts were reported by 12.7 and 11.8%, respectively. Males had a 15% higher odds of using at least one intervention (OR = 1.15; 95%CI: 1.02–1.31). Adults aged 25–34 showed a 48% higher odds of using at least one personal intervention compared to people aged 45–64 (OR = 1.48; 95%CI: 1.24–1.78). Residents of the largest cities (>500,000 inhabitants) were 46% more likely to implement personal interventions to reduce air pollution exposure in comparison to residents of rural areas (OR = 1.46; 95%CI: 1.19–1.78). Having children aged 4–12 years ( p < 0.05) increased the odds of implementation of personal intervention in comparison to people without children of this age. Individuals with frequent infections (≥5 per year) had 46% higher odds than those who reported not getting sick (OR = 1.46; 95%CI: 1.07–2.00). Conclusion Adults in Poland show low uptake of personal measures to reduce air pollution exposure. Socio-demographic differences in the implementation of a personal intervention to reduce air pollution were observed, with particular emphasis on gender, age, place of residence, having children, and economic status.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sierpiński et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: