This observational analysis evaluates safety and airspace performance using indicators for call sign similarity, suggesting improvements for air traffic management.
The air transportation system is a constantly evolving complex socio-economic entity, whose performance requires detailed monitoring. The well-established performance-based framework by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) pushed the development of various indicators to assess the Air Traffic Management (ATM) performance. This paper aims to propose a set of specific indexes to monitor the impact of Call Sign Similarity (CSS), an area under-investigated in literature. A CSS is recognized as a safety hazard that verifies when two flights share similar Call Signs, with the potential to generate Call Sign Confusion events, i.e., cases where instructions are mis-guided for two aircraft with CSS. For this purpose, two Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are proposed to evaluate airspace performance with implications for capacity and safety by means of: frequency of CSSs, and CSS overlapping time in the same sector. Early results obtained from the implementation of these two KPIs are provided in a use case for the European airspace, demonstrating their usability for ATM strategic planning accounting for both operational safety and airspace complexity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lombardi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: