Observational analysis shows lower striatal D2 receptor availability in individuals with tobacco or marijuana metabolites, suggesting a decline in dopaminergic function.
Introduction The status of striatal dopamine (DA) D2 receptors in cigarette smoking is equivocal. One potential explanation is unreliability of self-report of smoking status, which may not accurately reflect exposure to combustible smoke products and thus contribute variance to estimations of D2 availability (a compound index that is comprised of both DA levels and D2 density). Given that tobacco and marijuana smoke share hundreds of toxic compounds that could have similar effects on striatal D2 availability, we determined urine metabolites for both and compared striatal [11C]raclopride (RAC) positron emission tomography (PET) D2 availability between analyte negative (ANneg) and positive (ANpos) groups. We hypothesized that the ANpos group (positive for cigarette and/or marijuana metabolites) would have lower D2 availability than ANneg. Methods Twenty-nine participants had resting RAC scans and quantitative urinalysis data for the major metabolites of nicotine (cotinine) and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC; 11-nor-∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol-9-carboxylic acid (THCA)). Participants were classified as ANneg or ANpos. Parametric images of binding potential (BPND) were generated with MRTM2. Average BPND values were extracted from striatal subregions. Results Across all subregions, ANpos had an average of 13.1% lower BPND relative to ANneg.(range: 6.6 – 20.0%). Significant differences were primarily in the nucleus accumbens and putamen. There were no effects of alcohol use disorder (AUD; secondary analysis). Within the ANpos group, there were no effects of self-reported cigarette smoking or analyte subgroups. Conclusion ANpos individuals had lower striatal D2 availability relative to ANneg. Quantitative characterization of combustible smoke metabolites in PET studies of the dopaminergic system is recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoder et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: