PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 30, 2025Diagnostics14 citationsOpen Access

Beyond BMI: Rethinking Obesity Metrics and Cardiovascular Risk in the Era of Precision Medicine

View Full Paper

Key Points

  • Obesity redefinition shows enhanced risk prediction for cardiovascular disease, improving clinical outcomes with new metrics.
  • The analysis synthesizes data on metabolic health, focusing significantly on visceral and epicardial fat measurements.
  • Approach uses a narrative review of 35 recently published articles from 2018 to 2025 across precision medicine advancements.
  • Current limitations in access and costs highlight the need for better integration of imaging and omics in practice.

Abstract

Obesity remains a dominant risk factor for cardiovascular disease, yet its classification continues to rely heavily on body mass index (BMI)—a metric that fails to capture individual variability in fat distribution, metabolic health, and cardiometabolic risk. This narrative review analyzes 35 articles published between 2018 and 2025 to explore the limitations of BMI and outlines emerging strategies for obesity redefinition through a precision medicine lens. Drawing from recent advances in imaging, metabolomics, and genomic profiling, we highlight alternative metrics such as visceral adipose tissue (VAT), epicardial adipose tissue (EAT), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and multi-omic phenotyping that provide superior predictive value for cardiovascular outcomes. The review synthesizes data on metabolically healthy and unhealthy phenotypes, emphasizes the pathophysiological role of EAT in heart failure and arrhythmogenesis, and discusses the cardioprotective effects of pharmacologic agents such as glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists. Clinical implications include improved risk stratification, earlier disease detection, and individualized therapeutic targeting. Despite current barriers to widespread implementation—such as imaging cost, access to omics, and lack of guideline integration—this paradigm shift holds promise for refining cardiovascular prevention strategies. Redefining obesity using biologically informed, phenotype-based models is indispensable for aligning clinical practice with the complexities of modern cardiometabolic disease.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

A 2025 study studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/692b9d931d383f2b2a379d3dhttps://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15233025
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Beyond BMI: Rethinking Obesity Metrics and Cardiovascular Risk in the Era of Precision Medicine2025
  2. 2Moving away from BMI: a new era of diagnostic criteria in obesity2025
  3. 3Adiposology: A Tissue-centric Clinical Framework for Cardiometabolic Risk Beyond Body Mass Index2026
  4. 4How is obesity defined? Moving beyond the limitations of current measures to redefine obesity2026 · 1 citations
  5. 5Invited State of the Art Review for MCP Rethinking Obesity Beyond Body Mass Index: A Review of Body Composition and Chronic Disease Risk2026