Why the study?
Body mass index alone fails to account for cardiometabolic risk heterogeneity driven by adipose tissue dysfunction across domains such as fat distribution, limited expandability, altered signaling, and ectopic lipid deposition.
Design
Narrative concept-driven review
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Adipose dysfunction may refine cardiometabolic risk assessment beyond BMI; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Adiposology conceptualizes obesity primarily as a disorder of adipose tissue function rather than body size, with adipose tissue dysfunction expressed across four clinically relevant domains: fat distribution, limited expandability with fibrosis, altered immune–endocrine signaling, and ectopic lipid deposition. This perspective explains the cardiometabolic risk heterogeneity that remains unaccounted for by body mass index (BMI) alone. In this narrative, concept-driven review, mechanistic and clinically relevant human evidence from PubMed and Scopus (2005–2024), supplemented by targeted Consensus AI searches, was synthesized to inform a unifying clinical framework. We propose a clinician-oriented framework that integrates practical clinical proxies, such as waist-to-height ratio, triglyceride-to-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio, alanine aminotransferase or fatty liver index, glycated hemoglobin A1c, and surrogate markers of insulin resistance, within a stepwise pathway for screening, phenotyping, and risk prioritization. A complementary, mechanism-based intervention map is outlined to link these phenotypes with strategies aimed at reducing visceral and ectopic lipid burden, preserving cardiorenal function, and improving insulin sensitivity. This tissue-centric model supports phenotype-based clinical decision-making. It also enables electronic health record–embedded risk scoring with prospective validation aligned with the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) principles. It improves applicability across age, sex, and ethnic groups, including populations with higher cardiometabolic risk at lower BMI thresholds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhattacharyya et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: