This review highlights gaps in aligning clinical practice with computational pathology for colorectal cancer, suggesting improvements for diagnostic accuracy.
The pathology report in colorectal cancer (CRC) consists of more than 20 elements defined in guidelines such as the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) guidelines. Recently, computational tools have been proposed to advance the CRC diagnostic routine, yet most lack clinically validated results and focus on only three report elements. This review gives an overview of the current gaps and will contribute to aligning computational pathology with clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2025 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: