Natural experiment reveals 16% donation increase when tax noncompliance is publicly disclosed, highlighting altruism in community funding.
Do individuals contribute to public service provision when others in the community shirk on their taxes? The long‐standing literature on conditional cooperation has widely documented a knock‐on effect of freeriding. I argue that individuals may turn to civil society as an alternative way to fund public services. First, I leverage a natural experiment in Slovakia, based on the timing of a naming‐and‐shaming tax policy. Communities exposed to a public disclosure of noncompliance donate 16% more. Second, I replicate this via a survey experiment, showing an increase in charitable giving of 9% as well as eroding faith in the tax system. Highlighting the role of altruism, donations increase the most among respondents who believe their town relies on public services. In a conjoint, treated respondents also preferred public donations, suggesting an additional reputation mechanism. Finally, cross‐country survey evidence bolsters external validity, showing a robust correlation between perceived tax cheating and local volunteering.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2025 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: