Analysis reveals network structure influences customer-oriented selling in B2B sales teams, indicating optimizing centralization may enhance performance.
Purpose Based on the structural perspective of social network theory, this study aims at investigating how intra-team and inter-team network centralization of cross-functional B2B sales teams as well as their interaction influence team’s customer-oriented selling and sales performance, and the moderating effects of team structure (team instability) and sales complexity (customer purchase complexity) variables. Design/methodology/approach 319 valid responses from 76 cross-functional sales teams are used to test the hypotheses, and a structural equation model and hierarchical regression are employed to examine the proposed main and moderating effects. Findings The results indicate that intra-team centralization positively impacts customer-oriented selling, while inter-team centralization negatively impacts customer-oriented selling, and their interaction negatively impacts customer-oriented selling. Moreover, team instability positively moderates the link between intra-team network centralization and customer-oriented selling, and purchase complexity negatively moderates the relationship between inter-team network centralization and customer-oriented selling. Originality/value From a theoretical perspective, this paper extends the research level of customer-oriented selling from the individual level to the team level and enriches its antecedents from the network perspective. In addition, this study verifies the interaction effect of intra-team and inter-team centralizations on the team’s customer-oriented selling and sales performance, providing more comprehensive insights into the impact of network structure on team-level outcomes. From a practical perspective, the results offer valuable suggestions for enhancing customer-oriented selling and sales performance of B2B sales teams via effectively setting up the centralized intra-team network structure and the decentralized inter-team network structure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: