The review examines the impact of structural literacy on learning the discipline of architecture at the undergraduate level, as well as its influence on design processes. To bridge the knowledge application gap between structural literacy and design application in architecture, this review synthesizes published work on learning through the application of structural literacy in design processes. It also considers learning outcome assessment, design effectiveness measurement, and new learning approaches. The review aimed to compare hands-on learning with traditional learning methods, measure teaching methods, identify new learning methods, measure the impact of structural literacy on design and learning outcomes, and observe collaborative practices across diverse disciplines. The review conducted a comprehensive survey of international research on undergraduate architecture education using mixed, qualitative, and quantitative methods. The results indicate that active, hands-on collaborative learning approaches are more effective than continuous lecture-based approaches in enhancing structural comprehension and design integration. Although financial and access constraints restrict large-scale applications, digital and physical modeling software enhances conceptual understanding and design exploration. Although institutional and curricular barriers limit its application, interdisciplinary working enhances communication skills and facilitates structural integration. Curriculum revisions that initiate structured subjects early, with design studio linkages, strengthen student motivation and design efficiency. These findings indicate the extent to which collaborative frameworks and integrated teaching impact the development of structural literacy. The review emphasizes the need for curriculum revisions and interdisciplinary instruction to equip architecture students with the skills necessary for practical, creative, and contextually aware design work.
Amgad Fahmy (Thu,) studied this question.