Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative analysis from focus group discussions reveals social responsibility impacts health outcomes during the pandemic, suggesting the need for evolving social norms.
Introduction: The role of social responsibility has been used to underpin the implementation of rapidly changing non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to slow COVID-19 community transmission. Methods: To explore public awareness of COVID-19 and social responsibility in a pandemic, we conducted eight mobile app-based online focus group discussions (FGDs) with participants in Singapore between 28 March and 13 April 2020. Results: Findings from our online FGDs indicate that social responsibility, especially during the early stages of COVID-19, was influenced by external factors such as appropriate legislation and allowances in existing societal culture, as well as action-based factors including mask wearing and safe distancing. Both were further mitigated by individual factors that mediated an individual’s capacity and capability to comply with rapidly changing legislation during a pandemic. Conclusion: While similar NPIs have been imposed globally, considerable between-country differences remain in health outcomes and adherence rates, displaying the complex nature of social responsibility. Evol- ving the role of social responsibility should be accompanied by expanding social norms and less reliance on punitive approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lim et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: