PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 2, 2025Frontiers in Psychology2 citationsOpen Access

The mediating role of psychological resilience in the relationship between deep learning approach and mathematical creativity: integrating structural equation model and network analysis

View Full Paper
YLYingyi Liu

Key Points

  • Mathematical creativity is positively influenced by deep learning approach through psychological resilience, addressing a critical educational gap.
  • Key evidence indicates that psychological resilience mediates this relationship, highlighting its importance in creativity development.
  • The study employed structural equation modeling and network analysis to explore these complex dynamics among university students.
  • Findings support the emphasis on enhancing psychological resilience to foster mathematical creativity effectively.

Abstract

Background Previous scholars have conducted a series of explorations on the relationship between learning approaches and mathematical creativity, but it remains unclear how deep learning approach predicts mathematical creativity. According to the componential theory of creativity, psychological resilience may be one of the mediating processes, but the network relationships among psychological resilience, learning approaches, and mathematical creativity are currently unclear. Methods To clarify these relationships, we recruited 986 Chinese university students to complete questionnaire surveys, employing an integrated approach combining structural equation modeling and network analysis for the first time to reveal the mediating relationship and network relationships among learning approaches, psychological resilience, and mathematical creativity. Results The study found that deep learning approach positively predicted mathematical creativity through the mediation of psychological resilience. In the network, node centrality demonstrates the strongest characteristics across three dimensions: strength, closeness, and expected influences, followed by psychological resilience, while deep learning methods exhibit the weakest characteristics. Therefore, compared to stimulating mathematical creativity at the motivational level, directly stimulating it from the volitional level like psychological resilience would be a more effective approach. Conclusion The findings of this study contribute to helping educational practitioners understand the internal relationships among learning approaches, psychological resilience, and mathematical creativity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yingyi Liu (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/692e3d626c9b3ab28c186d77https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1697817
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Influencing factors and prediction of creativity among college students in traditional Chinese medicine schools: network analysis2026
  2. 2Exploring the relationships among creative self-efficacy, mathematical creative thinking, and mathematical achievement2025
  3. 3The mediating role of self-regulation in the relationship between psychological resilience and computational thinking2026
  4. 4Unveiling Mathematical Creativity: The Interplay of Intelligence, Intellect, and Education2025 · 1 citations
  5. 5Role of creative self-efficacy and perceived creativity as predictors of mathematical creative thinking: Mediating role of computational thinking2024 · 27 citations