Retrospective analysis shows prognostic value of FDG PET-derived features for outcomes in soft tissue sarcoma, suggesting improved treatment strategies.
Treatment and outcome of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are presently guided by stage and clinicopathological factors. Radiomics, the quantitative analysis of images applied to [ 18 F]fluoro-2-deoxy- d -glucose (FDG) PET could improve prognostication and thereby treatment outcomes, especially due to its ability to quantify intratumoural metabolic heterogeneity. However, the data for its utility in STS is limited. This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of pretreatment FDG PET-derived radiomic features for patients with STS. A retrospective analysis was performed of patients with STS who underwent FDG PET and were treated with curative intent in a sarcoma centre ( n = 44). Tumour segmentation was performed using a 40% maximum standardised uptake value threshold, and 107 radiomic features were extracted. Univariable and multivariate Cox regression evaluated radiomic features against local recurrence free survival (LRFS), distant recurrence free survival (DRFS), disease free survival (DFS), and overall survival. Survival difference was then assessed using Kaplan–Meier survival curves constructed from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) derived thresholds. Our study demonstrated measures of tumour heterogeneity predicted outcome, the strongest predictor being, GLSZM SZNUN , which was a significant predictor on multivariate analysis of DRFS [heart rate (HR) = 0.00031, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.1 × 10 −7 –0.45, P = 0.03] and DFS (HR = 0.00047, 95% CI = 1.3 × 10 −6 –0.16, P = 0.01). Stratification using ROC-derived thresholds showed survival difference for LRFS ( P = 0.045), DRFS ( χ 2 = 4.7, P < 0.001), and DFS ( χ 2 = 8.1, P = 0.005). Larger prospective multicentre cohorts are required to verify our findings and enable integration into clinical decision aids and precision medicine in STS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Noh et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: