Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational analysis identifies key markers for reducing anti-nutritional factors in soybean, suggesting improvements in nutritional quality through genetic architecture.
Anti-nutritional factors (ANFs) can reduce nutrient bioavailability for monogastric animals. Therefore, this study aimed to understand the genetic architecture underlying ANF accumulation in soybean. Diversity arrays technology and a spectrophotometric method were employed to generate genotypic and phenotypic data, respectively, and gene mining was performed within 100-kb genomic window. A significant difference was found regarding ANFs content in the genotypes (p < 0.001). Significant SNP markers for phytate were identified on chromosomes 3, 4, 13, and 20 by FarmCPU, and for total trypsin inhibitors (TTI) on 6, 12, and 14 by CMLM models, whereas mrMLM model detected markers on chromosome 3, 12 and 15 for phytate, 4, 9, 13, 17 and 18 for TTI. Genes associated with phytate content include Glyma.03G001600, Glyma.04G194600, Glyma.13G128200, Glyma.20G118700, Glyma.14G213400, and Glyma.16G126400. For TTI, the genes are Glyma.06G074700, Glyma.12G241600, Glyma.14G176700, Glyma.13G052700, and Glyma.18G050400. These genes are primarily linked to plant defense and substrate interactions. Most promising SNP markers for marker-assisted selection aimed at reducing phytate levels include Soy_3_218818 (218,818 bp), Soy_3_241209 (241,209 bp), Soy_4_45462019 (45,462,019 bp), Soy_14_48672982 (48,672,982 bp), and Soy_6_5695090 (5,695,090 bp). For TTI, key markers include Soy_14_43649238 (43,649,238 bp), Soy_12_41339023 (41,339,023 bp), Soy_18_4301721 (4,301,721 bp), and Soy_13_14029215 (14,029,215 bp). These findings offer a valuable foundation for marker-assisted breeding aimed at improving soybean nutritional quality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Palange et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: