Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The analysis reveals strategic planning impacts on innovation policy for state-owned companies, suggesting a need for stronger connections.
The article reflects the results of the study of conceptual and actual connections of innovative development programs (IDP) of Russian state-owned companies as an instrument of innovation policy and the main documents of strategic planning of scientific and technological policy (STP). The conceptual place and role of IDP in the system of goal-setting of STP are determined, the actual connections of IDP with STP documents in the period 2011–2022 are studied. It is revealed that the IDP have reflected the main provisions of STP documents at the national level and the underlying documents of the industry level once were almost completely absent. At the same time, in the strategic documents of STP for the period 2011–2022 the PIR tool was not officially defined at either the national or industry level. An exception was, for example, the Forecast of Scientific and Technological Development (S&T) of the fuel and energy complex of Russia for the period up to 2035, where the PIR was defined as a tool for developing the scientific and technological potential of the industry. A study of the modern outline of strategic documents on the policy of technological sovereignty shows the reflection of the PIR as the main tool for implementation, in the Strategy of the Scientific and Technological Revolution, the Concept of Technological Development and the Federal Law on Technological Policy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Julia Vologova (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: