The present study explored human moral perceptions of robots and examined how these perceptions vary based on the anthropomorphic features of the agent, the type of harm inflicted, and how the robot reacts to aversive stimuli. An online survey comprised first-year psychology students (N = 234) and participants recruited via social media (N = 63). Participants watched four videos depicting harmful or aversive scenarios containing a humanoid (NAO) or machine-like robot (Roomba). Scenarios included turning the robot off, physically abusing the robot, verbally abusing the robot and socially ostracizing the robot. The robots' protest behaviors towards the harmful or aversive scenarios were either physical protest, verbal protest, a combination of verbal and physical protests, or no protest at all. The humanoid robot received significantly more moral concern than the machine-like robot in the social ostracism and turn-off scenarios. However, there was no difference in moral concern observed between the humanoid and machine-like robot in the physical and verbal abuse scenarios. Some differences between scenarios were agent dependent. As predicted, both the machine-like and humanoid robot received significantly more moral concern in the physical abuse scenario than in all other scenarios. Finally, despite the hypothesized influence of protest on attributions of moral concern, no significant impact of protest was present. The present study provides a solid foundation for future research exploring the psychological and moral implications of robot mistreatment.
John Archer (Fri,) studied this question.