Proof-of-concept highlights NIR spectroscopy's ability to detect Burkholderia glumae in rice seeds, indicating potential for contamination monitoring.
Strong evidence that near-infrared transmittance and reflectance spectroscopy can detect B. glumae contamination in bacterial suspensions and in individual rice seeds, respectively, was shown in this proof-of-concept study. For B. glumae suspension (0.0 to 1.42 x 10 4 CFU mL -1 ), NIR transmittance spectroscopy using partial least squares (PLS) regression calibration model (1000-1650 nm) showed a coefficient of determination (R 2 ) = 0.984 and root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.031. For rice seeds treated in varying dilutions of B. glumae (0.0 to 4.52 log 10 CFU/mL bacterial load in seeds), NIR reflectance spectroscopy using a selected PLS second derivative with Savitzky-Golay smoothing calibration model (1000-1650 nm) resulted in coefficient of determination of calibration (R 2 Cal) = 0.97, root mean square error of calibration (RMSEC) = 0.06, coefficient of determination of cross-validation (R 2 CV) = 0.93, standard error of cross validation (SECV) = 0.08 at 7 factors; the independent validation showed coefficient of determination of validation (R 2 Val) = 0.83 and standard error of prediction (SEP) = 0.11. Two-category qualitative PLS calibration model (1000-1650 nm) correctly classified 94.7% of uninoculated and 100% of inoculated seeds with independent validation of 90% and 100%, respectively. Predictions may be attributable to differences in aliphatic hydrocarbons, cellulose, amide, oil, protein, and starch contents across rice seeds that are uninoculated and inoculated at varying dilution levels. Developing NIR-based instrumentation for individual seed segregation of healthy from contaminated rice seeds can support a clean seed program and can be a useful tool for quarantine officers for seed exchange and farmers’ seed production.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elizabeth B. Maghirang (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: