Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional analysis finds inadequate thermal comfort and high temperatures impacting well-being in a health faculty, suggesting necessary interventions.
Background: Thermal comfort is a multifaceted concept that is influenced by environmental factors such as air temperature,mean radiant temperature, air velocity, and relative humidity (RH). These elements significantly affect individual well-being andperformance, particularly in office settings. Accordingly, this study investigated thermal comfort within a public health faculty.Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2023 at a Health Faculty in Yazd, Iran. The study recorded the environmentalparameters necessary for calculating the predicted mean vote (PMV) and predicted percentage of dissatisfied (PPD) on November13th at 1 p.m. Calculations followed ISO 7730:2005 standards. Statistical analysis was performed using R version 4.3.3, withnormality tested via the Shapiro-Wilk test. The Wilcoxon test was used for comparisons between two groups, while the KruskalWallis test was utilized for multiple-group comparisons.Results: The third floor exhibited a consistently higher temperature (24.1 °C), potentially causing discomfort. Although temperature,humidity, and thermal comfort indices varied across floors and corridors, the lack of statistical significance (P>0.05) suggestsuniform environmental conditions. Most PMV values across floors fell outside the acceptable range (-1<PMV<+1), indicatinggeneral discomfort. PPD values were around 50% for all floors, except for the third floor, which had a PPD of 14%.Conclusion: The study underscored the need for thermal comfort interventions in the health faculty building. A substantial portionof the building’s occupants experienced thermal discomfort, potentially impacting their health and productivity. Addressing theseissues is crucial for enhancing the overall environment and well-being of the faculty members and students.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
hamidreza torkian (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: