Cross‐sectional study shows strong concordance between line‐field confocal optical coherence tomography and histopathology in discoid lupus erythematosus diagnoses.
Discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) is the most common variant of cutaneous lupus. Histopathology remains the gold standard for diagnosis, but it carries a risk of scarring in a disease already prone to cicatricial outcomes. Additionally, diagnostic delays may occur due to variable processing times, particularly in challenging cases. Line‐field confocal optical coherence tomography (LC‐OCT) is a novel non‐invasive imaging technique offering high‐resolution, histology‐like features. This study evaluates its diagnostic accuracy in DLE by assessing concordance with histopathology. A cross‐sectional study enrolled histologically confirmed DLE from three tertiary referral hospitals. Eleven histological criteria were assessed using LC‐OCT and subsequently compared to histopathology. Concordance was evaluated using Cohen's Kappa coefficient ( K ), with McNemar's test applied to detect significant differences ( α = 0.05). Twenty‐eight patients with DLE participated in the study. LC‐OCT demonstrated strong agreement with histopathology in key diagnostic features of DLE. Near‐perfect concordance ( K = 1, 100% agreement) was observed for interface dermatitis, dermal vessel dilation, epidermal atrophy, and incontinentia pigmenti. Substantial agreement was found for epidermal disarray ( K = 0.85), spongiosis ( K = 0.70), necrotic keratinocytes ( K = 0.70), and infundibular dilation ( K = 0.79). Overall, LC‐OCT achieved a Cohen's Kappa of 0.74 with 87.66% concordance, and no statistically significant differences were observed between the two methods (McNemar p = 0.627). LC‐OCT is a rapid, effective, and non‐invasive diagnostic tool for DLE, demonstrating strong concordance with histopathology and potential for early diagnosis and clinical implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maione et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: