Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
December 4, 2025International Journal of Eating Disorders

The Discrepancies Between Researchers and the Community When Identifying Intervention Targets for Eating Disorders

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

MPMia L. Pellizzer

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Secondary analysis highlights differing endorsement of treatment targets in eating disorders, suggesting interventions must consider diverse perspectives.

Key Points

  • Marked discrepancies exist in intervention targeting between lived experience and researcher perspectives, impacting treatment effectiveness.
  • Post hoc analyses revealed researchers had lower endorsement rates for 70 items, while individuals with lived experience endorsed 25 items higher.
  • Secondary data analysis utilized a modified Delphi study approach involving 138 participants across four panels for consensus assessment.
  • Encouraging alignment between perspectives is needed to refine mental health interventions for eating disorders effectively.

Cite This Study

Mia L. Pellizzer (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6930dc6bea1aef094cca1e9bhttps://doi.org/10.1111/eat.70009
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Early intervention and augmentation therapy for eating disorders: a Delphi consensus study on transdiagnostic cognitive behavioural processes2025 · 4 citations
  2. 2A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance2021 · 6,240 citations
  3. 3The association between loneliness or social isolation and food and eating behaviours: A scoping review2023 · 75 citations
  4. 4Type I Error Rate Comparisons of Post Hoc Procedures for I j Chi-Square Tables2000 · 458 citations
  5. 5Central coherence and <scp>set‐shifting</scp> between <scp>nonunderweight</scp> eating disorders and anorexia nervosa: A systematic review and <scp>meta‐analysis</scp>2020 · 69 citations