Unsteady-state microkinetic modeling shows improved reaction kinetics in CO reduction and oxygen evolution, suggesting significant insights for electrocatalytic processes.
Electrochemical processes, such as water splitting and carbon dioxide/monoxide (CO 2 /CO) reduction, will play a prominent role in the ongoing quest for mitigating climate change. For such reactions, microkinetic modeling (MKM) is a valuable tool to relate electrolyzer operating conditions, such as pH, temperature, and potential, to current densities and faradaic efficiencies. However, previous studies have solely focused on steady‐state modeling of electrochemical kinetics. Here, we perform unsteady‐state MKM (USS‐MKM) with and without potential sweeping to capture transient dynamics and realistically model reaction kinetics. This analysis demonstrates that sweeping leads to accurate description of the dynamics of current‐potential relationships that arise during experimental linear sweep voltammetry or staircase voltammetry measurements. The proposed approach is validated using CO reduction and oxygen evolution reactions, where good agreement is observed between this long‐time USS‐MKM results, USS‐MKM with potential sweeping, and previously reported steady‐state MKM data. It is also showed that this approach leads to reasonable agreement with experimental CO reduction current density data. Moreover, this proposed approach is automated, scaling to large reaction mechanisms, and enables a graphical representation of electrochemical reaction networks. Overall, by enabling USS‐MKM with potential sweeping, this framework simplifies the study of complex electrocatalytic mechanisms and offers valuable insights into their operation under dynamic conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pathak et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: