Analysis shows how water temperatures influence Arctic grayling distribution in mountain streams, suggesting critical habitat preservation is needed.
Temperature is a critical abiotic factor driving the distribution of aquatic ectotherms in thermally heterogenous stream networks. However, comprehensive analyses of co‐located stream temperature and ectotherm telemetry data at ecologically pertinent spatiotemporal scales are not available. Such analyses are essential for predicting shifts in ectotherm distributions in response to climate‐driven changes in the availability of suitable thermal habitats. Our study addresses gaps in the modelling of aquatic species distribution by applying modern analytical techniques to datasets containing co‐located habitat data and animal occurrence data collected over large spatial extents over multiple years. Specifically, our objective was to characterise variation in the availability of thermal habitat and quantify its influence on the distribution of a cold‐water fish, Arctic grayling ( Thymallus arcticus ), during the summer feeding period in the Parsnip River watershed in northern British Columbia. Between 2019 and 2021, we collected air and water temperature data in the Parsnip River and several tributaries to develop a spatial stream network model (SSNM) that was used to characterise the spatiotemporal distribution of water temperatures in the watershed. Over this period, we also tagged and continuously monitored the spatial distribution of adult Arctic grayling using acoustic telemetry. Their detections were analysed with dynamic site occupancy models as a function of co‐located water temperatures predicted by the SSNM, stream magnitude, and stream gradient. Both water temperature and stream magnitude exhibited non‐linear relationships with probability of site occupancy by adult Arctic grayling, whereas no effect of stream gradient was detected. Results suggest a high probability of occupancy (> 0.66 at temperatures ranging from 6.9°C–14.7°C, with a peak at 10.8°C) The predicted distribution of thermal habitat within this range was potentially limiting in only one of the 3 years during the study period. Based on maximum weekly average temperatures, the distribution of thermal habitat with a potential high probability of use during the summer feeding period was reduced from 55% in 2019 and 52% in 2020 to 17% of the accessible watershed length in 2021. Small streams in high elevation tributaries (> 800 m) are important cold‐water habitats, providing Arctic grayling and other cold‐water adapted aquatic ectotherms with thermal refuge under warm conditions. Preservation of high elevation streams and restoration of buffering upslope processes in impacted watersheds should be considered a priority to ensure a future for cold‐water adapted species in watersheds that exceed thermal optima at lower elevations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O’Connor et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: