Mixed-methods pilot highlights improved documentation quality and efficiency with AI voice technology in child psychiatry.
Aims and method Artificial intelligence ambient voice technology (AI AVT), which uses a large language model to summarise clinical dialogue into electronic notes and GP letters, has emerged. We conducted a mixed-methods, pre–post (manual versus AVT-assisted documentation) service development pilot to evaluate its use in a child and adolescent out-patient clinic. Results The median administration time per clinical encounter reduced from 27 min (manual) to 10 min (AVT) ( P < 0.001). On average, AVT-assisted documentation required only 45% of the time for manual documentation ( P < 0.001). Clinician-rated accuracy, quality and efficiency were significantly higher for AVT-assisted documentation. Patient acceptance was high, with 97% reporting that clinicians were not distracted by note-taking. Thematic analysis from focus groups identified positive effects derived from AVT (improved productivity and clinician well-being), but was balanced by barriers (technological limitations). Clinical implications Integration of AVT into clinical workflows can significantly alleviate documentation burden, reduce cognitive strain and free up clinical capacity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mark Brewerton (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: