This analysis finds that integrating proximity theory can reduce emissions by up to 50% in public transport, indicating benefits for sustainable MaaS solutions.
This paper investigates the integration of proximity theory (PT) into the management of public transport service disruptions within sustainable Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) systems, an area that is largely underexplored. PT provides a multidimensional framework for analyzing relationships and interactions within complex systems, encompassing five dimensions: geographical, cognitive, institutional, organizational, and social, each influencing coordination, learning, and adaptability. Building on this framework, the study introduces temporal proximity as an original sub-dimension of geographical proximity, forming a spatial–temporal proximity theory (PTST), which highlights the critical role of timing, synchronization, and coordinated responses in transport disruption management. To operationalize these principles, a mixed-integer programming (MIP) model was developed to optimize traveler assignments across 50 routes for 10 travelers, minimizing delays, transfers, walking distance, crowding, and CO2 emissions. Two scenarios were analyzed: one without environmental considerations and another with CO2 penalties. Results show that emissions were reduced by up to 50% for certain routes, while maintaining feasible travel times and route choices. The case study demonstrates that PTST can be operationalized as a practical tool, bridging mobility resilience and environmental responsibility, and providing actionable insights for sustainable and intelligent MaaS platforms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vale et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: