This analysis reveals tumor microenvironment patterns in breast cancer, indicating that immune profiling may guide personalized therapy selection.
This study addresses the limited mechanistic understanding behind medical imaging for tumor microenvironment (TME) assessment. We developed a novel framework that analyzes tumor imaging heterogeneity index (TIHI)-correlated genes to uncover underlying TME biology and therapeutic vulnerabilities. DCE-MRI and mRNA data from 987 high-risk breast cancer patients in the I-SPY2 trial, together with mRNA data from 508 patients in GSE25066, were analyzed. TIHI-associated genes were identified via Pearson correlation, clustered via weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), and subgroups were defined via non-negative matrix factorization (NMF). The clinical relevance of the image-to-gene comprehensive (I2G-C) subtype defined by subgroups was assessed using logistic regression and Cox analysis. I2G-C comprised four clusters with distinct immune and replication/repair functions. It further stratified receptor, PAM50, and RPS5 subtypes. The “immune+/replication+” was more likely to achieve pathological complete response (pCR) (OR = 2.587, p < 0.001), while the “immune−/replication−” was the least likely to achieve pCR (OR = 0.402, p < 0.001). The “immune+/replication+” showed sensitivity to pembrolizumab (OR = 10.192, p < 0.001) and veliparib/carboplatin (OR = 5.184, p = 0.006), while “immune-/replication-” responded poorly to pembrolizumab (OR = 0.086, p < 0.001). Additionally, “immune+/replication-” had the best distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), whereas “immune-/replication+” had the worst (log-rank p = 6 × 10−4, HR = 5.45). By linking imaging heterogeneity directly to molecular subtypes and therapeutic response, this framework provides a robust, non-invasive surrogate for genomic profiling and a strategic tool for personalized neoadjuvant therapy selection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: