Analysis shows improved air quality metrics in Warsaw, suggesting effective energy transition policies are mitigating pollution.
For many years, Warsaw has been one of the European cities with the worst air quality, mainly due to harmful pollutants emitted by the residential sector and street traffic. This has led to high concentrations of particulate matter (PM), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and also benzo alpha pyrene (BaP), often exceeding WHO standards. However, since 2010, there have been significant changes in the Polish energy mix, with a trend towards a decrease in the share of coal, with a simultaneous increase in the share of renewable energy sources and natural gas. The article presents the related effects of the relevant central government’s policy during the last decade, further supported by the pro-environment decisions of the Warsaw authorities. We also present trends in the concentration of harmful pollutants over the 2012–2023 decade as recorded by the air quality monitoring system. Complete pollution records for 2023 come from two air quality monitoring systems recently operating in the city (GIOŚ official stationary and AIRLY IoT sensor systems). Since the sensors of these systems are located at different sites, the average annual records of both systems were compared indirectly, using the computer simulation results of key pollutant propagation in 2023. Based on the tests conducted, the hypothesis of equality of the annual means for the results from both the monitoring systems and the modeling is not rejected, despite a seemingly clear underestimation of the IoT sensors’ recordings versus the official ones. The reasons for these differences are investigated through a direct comparison and analysis of the average monthly recordings from the monitoring systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nahorski et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: